Saturday, September 18, 2010

COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER?

Sault Tribe Board of Directors Sept. 21 special meeting moves to Sept. 22 2010


Written by Communications Department Friday, 17 September 2010

SAULT STE. MARIE, Mich. - The special meeting of the Sault Tribe Board of Directors scheduled for Sept. 21 has been changed to Wednesday, Sept. 22, at 10 am. The meeting will be held at the Kewadin Casino and Convention Center, Sault.

The board will consider the resolution - Compliance with Court Orders Sault Tribe v. Ex.-Key Employees and Bouschor.

This special meeting announcement begs the question/'s:
Is someone not in compliance with a court order and if not...WHO & WHY?

The question was posed to one of my Unit One directors...actually the only representative that I can expect an answer from...DJ Malloy.

Another question that I have is, why isn't the Sault Tribe's newspaper, the member's paper, not providing us with the news we are entitled to? Why do we continually hear what is going on in our tribe via the Detroit newspapers rather than our own?

We have already learned that the Sault Tribe board failed to make timely business decisions or provide an exit strategy for the Greektown bankruptcy causing a tremendous loss to the Sault Tribe.

We have also learned that there may be a connection between that failure and an allegation of huge gambling debts incurred by one of Greektown's original investors, Dimitrios "Jim" Papas to which collection was postponed for reasons that are currently under investigation. I posted the article to which an anonymous poster suggested that I was lucky my bones weren't found. Not quite sure how to take that other than as a threat or warning of sorts.

The answers to these questions should be available to any Sault Tribe member who asks and just as soon as I hear from DJ Malloy I will post her answer here. If any other director would like to offer an answer or explanation please don't hesitate to jump right in.

Remember who got us into this mess... Bernard Bouschor and now someone is not in compliance with a court order regarding the lawsuit against him and worse yet, we are actually paying this guy to represent us!

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I would like to know

Who brought forth this resolution?
Did they go through the proper channels?
Is this an action against one of the defendants?
Is this an action against a paid representative?
Will this action jeopardize any part of the lawsuit?
Will it result in the removal of an elected official?
Is this just another stunt by Bouschor to delay or complicate the upcoming trial?
How did this reach this level of scrutiny?
Is this a challenge that can be ignored.

REMEMBER THAT THE TRIBE'S CONSTITUTION ALLOWS ANYTHING

Anonymous said...

Well what is the resolution about. If DJ Malloy answered your questions, what on earth did she say ? Your post raises more questions than it answers.

Lynne Weaver said...

Anonymous...the resolution as written was promised to be provided to me for posting on Wednesday. You can then read it for yourself.

Anonymous said...

read between the lines these things take time your doing great lynn get it all out there most of us have to stay anonymous for now due to jobs but i think we are shaking the trees DJ forgetts she was fired at election time also two years previouse take them all out DJ

Our right to make changes through referendum is the one voice we have left....use it.